Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platform 🚀rocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Pick the platform that fits your style
Frameworks we support
Integrations we support
Two powerful platforms—Softr and Rocket—offer enterprise‑grade capabilities for app development. This comparison looks at their core workflows, security features, and user experience. The discussion covers building from no‑code to AI‑prompted app construction and highlights how each platform supports modern enterprise use cases.
What if building secure enterprise apps felt as smooth and fast as slipping into a super shoe built for speed?
Today’s teams need platforms that balance speed, structure, and security—and that’s where Rocket.new and Softer come in. This comparison of Softer vs Rocket dives into their capabilities, developer experience, and how they measure up in real-world enterprise scenarios.
Compare Softer vs Rocket to determine which platform best suits enterprise workflows that require strong security, modern design, and scalable app development. This helps teams select what works for secure, scalable app development in today's tech environment.
Here is your comparison in a clean, tabular format:
| Category | Softr | Rocket |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Overview | Visual no-code builder with database-first architecture. Connects to Airtable, Notion, Google Sheets, or uses Softr Databases. Build UIs using blocks like lists, charts, and forms. | AI-powered app generator. Input app idea in natural language or provide Figma design; Rocket generates full React/Tailwind or Flutter apps automatically. |
| Data Modeling & Access | Manage relational tables, field types (text, lookup, attachment, etc.). GDPR and SOC-2 compliant Softr Database hosted on AWS. Available even on free plans. | Uses Supabase for backend modeling. Prompt input defines models and relationships dynamically. GitHub integration supports developer control. |
| Security & Permissions | Enterprise-grade features including SAML SSO, user roles, group permissions, and page/block-level access control. | Authentication managed via integrations like Supabase, Stripe, and OAuth. Version control through GitHub supports code-level security auditing. |
| UI Construction & Logic | Build using drag-and-drop blocks. Define visual logic, trigger APIs, and integrate tools like Zapier and Make for dynamic workflows. | UI and logic built through AI chat with C.L.E.A.R. prompt strategies. The visual editor allows manual refinements after generation. |
| Prompt-Driven Generation | Not applicable. All logic and UI are manually configured via the visual builder. | Input prompts like “build a dashboard with login.” Rocket parses and auto-generates app screens, layout, and logic. |
| Tooling & Integration | Integrates with Airtable, Notion, Google Sheets, Zapier, Make, and APIs. Ideal for internal tools, portals, and dashboards. | Supports Figma, Supabase, GitHub, Netlify, Stripe, OpenAI, Gemini, and Anthropic. Suitable for fast frontend generation and full-stack prototypes. |
| Workflow & Deployment | Publish directly through Softr. Manual versioning. Suited for internal tools and multi-user portals needing data access and permissions. | Built-in version control, screen retry options, and GitHub sync. Publish to web or mobile via Netlify or public/private hosting. |
| Security & Enterprise Readiness | GDPR and SOC-2 compliant database. SAML SSO and fine-grained user control make Softr highly suited for secure internal tools. | Depends on backend providers like Supabase for security. Enterprise-readiness is achieved via integrations and secure deployment practices. |
| Workflow Fashion | Ideal for spreadsheet-driven teams. Offers step-by-step UI construction and logic control through blocks. | Better for design-led teams comfortable with natural language prompting. Offers flexibility through conversational refinements. |
| Release Velocity | Requires setup for database, UI blocks, roles, and permissions. Ideal for teams requiring structured, scalable internal tools. | Instant creation from a single prompt to a working UI. Perfect for quick MVPs, design reviews, and iterative testing. |
| Customization & Control | Manual control via templates, custom code blocks, and detailed data structures. Provides more structural flexibility. | Auto-generates code but allows prompt and visual refinements. GitHub sync enables devs to override logic and layout with full control. |
Imagine you need to build an internal tool to track projects and employee performance.
Create a Softr Database with tables: Projects, Employees, Metrics
Build List/Grid/Chart blocks to display data
Configure user roles so managers see client data, and employees see only their own
Use Zapier or API to connect to external databases or automate workflows
Describe prompt: “Build a dashboard web app showing project list, team list, metrics charts, and login”
Refine via chat: adjust layout, set up authentication, and add edit forms
Deploy instantly, connect the Supabase backend via integration, and publish on Netlify
“Turn Your Ideas Into Reality - Without Writing a Single Line of Code!“ — LinkedIn Post How It Works:
1. Describe your idea (in plain English-no tech jargon needed).
2. Watch Rocket.new build it - design, logic, database, everything.
3. Publish with 1 click - instantly live, no headaches.
Many enterprise teams seek platforms that support secure data, modern workflows, and fast iteration. Here are ten notable platforms offering these features:
Softr (enterprise‑grade security, flexible database, workflows)
Rocket (prompt‑driven app building, fast shipping)
Retool (low‑code internal tools)
Appsmith (open‑source enterprise tools)
OutSystems (highly scalable enterprise low‑code)
Mendix (enterprise low‑code platform)
Bubble (visual development with plugin ecosystem)
Glide Apps (sheet‑based mobile apps with user auth)
Microsoft Power Apps (deep integration with the Office stack)
Webflow (design‑first sites with CMS and workflow automation)
Softr and Rocket stand out when security, modern workflow, and enterprise scaling matter.
Rocket improves app development efficiency with faster code generation and iterative prompts to refine logic quickly. Softr relies on a more methodical approach—visual blocks and database connections.
Softr provides more stability, with block control, a secure database, user permissions, and audit logs. Rocket offers fast ride builds, but it requires trust in backend integrations, such as Supabase and GitHub syncing.
If your team is familiar with spreadsheet-style app design, Softr will feel right at home: drag-and-drop blocks, database setup, block mapping. If your team loves prompt description or design‑to‑app workflows, Rocket’s prompt chat interface is ideal.
Make a choice based on how your team works:
Prefer rapid idea‑to‑app with AI prompts? Try Rocket.
Need robust app structure, granular security, and spreadsheet‑style editing? Go with Softr’s enterprise‑ready platform.
Use this comparison to match your workflow rhythm. At a lighter speed, Softr supports careful app construction. If you plan to operate at marathon pace, Rocket delivers apps faster.
By comparing Softr and Rocket, you gain clarity on key differences: Softr offers more structure and stable data management; Rocket empowers rapid, AI-prompt-driven builds ideal for prototyping or MVPs. The choice depends on whether you want a stable ride or a fast ride. Understanding workflows, integrations, and team comfort with prompts versus visual editing helps you make a smarter platform choice.
Final thought: softer vs Rocket comparison shows both platforms excel—pick the one that best fits how your team builds and scales.
