Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platform 🚀rocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Topics
Generate apps with prompts or Figma
Frameworks we support
Integrations we support
Which no-code tool is the right fit for your project? This blog breaks down FlutterFlow and Bubble by learning curve, design, workflows, and app support. You’ll walk away knowing which option aligns better with your goals.
No code platforms have reshaped how apps are built.
Instead of long development cycles and endless writing of code, teams can now ship products faster. But while speed is great, the real challenge is choosing the right tool.
Most people deciding between no-code platforms eventually land on two: Flutterflow and Bubble.
Both look powerful. Both help you move faster. Both support app ideas from prototype to launch.
But the big question remains: which one fits your project?
This blog will compare FlutterFlow vs Bubble from every angle: learning curve, design, workflows, mobile apps, web apps, and more.
Bubble is one of the oldest and most trusted no-code platforms. It was designed with web applications in mind, which makes it the go-to tool for many entrepreneurs and businesses. Bubble allows you to build complex systems without touching traditional app development methods.
Strengths of Bubble
Web app focus: Ideal for complex web applications that require heavy data processing.
Internal tools: Companies use Bubble for dashboards, reporting apps, and employee-facing internal tools.
Database management: Offers strong database management, letting you connect data structures easily.
Backend logic: Handles app logic and backend workflows better than most other no code platforms.
User authentication: Built-in support for login, signup, and role-based access.
Complex workflows: Handles multiple-step actions and detailed automation.
Third party services: Wide API integrations for external systems.
Community plugins: Access to thousands of plugins created by other developers.
Limitations of Bubble
Steep learning curve: Beginners often face a steep learning curve because of backend-heavy workflows.
Responsive design tools: Making designs mobile-friendly can be frustrating.
No code export: You cannot export the app’s code, which limits flexibility.
Mobile apps: Bubble apps for mobile devices are not truly native. They usually need wrappers.
App store publishing: Publishing to the app store or Google Play Store requires workarounds.
Flutterflow is much newer than Bubble but has grown rapidly. It’s built on Google’s Flutter framework, which makes it stronger in mobile app development. If you want to create mobile apps that look modern and polished, Flutterflow is a great pick.
Strengths of Flutterflow
Mobile app focus: Built specifically for creating mobile applications and native mobile apps.
Cross platform: Build once and publish for Android apps and iOS.
Code export: Supports full code export, giving access to the app’s code.
Custom code: You can integrate custom code to extend functionality.
Pre built templates: Speeds up creating apps with ready-made templates.
Responsive design tools: Provides modern tools to create visually appealing mobile apps.
UI components: Comes with polished ui components designed for mobile devices.
Native device features: Supports push notifications, GPS, and camera access.
App store publishing: Direct publishing to Google Play Store and Apple App Store.
Limitations of Flutterflow
Database management: Not as powerful as Bubble’s backend features.
Backend logic: Limited for complex backend-heavy workflows.
Learning curve: Easier than Bubble but still requires effort.
Internal tools: Weaker compared to Bubble for internal tools.
Complex web apps: Not designed for large-scale web applications.
When you evaluate a no-code development platform, the learning curve is one of the most practical factors. It determines how quickly you can transition from idea to product.
Bubble
Has a steep learning curve.
Building complex web apps requires learning database management, app logic, and custom workflows.
Responsive design tools are tricky, adding more time for beginners.
Flutterflow
Easier learning curve than Bubble.
Drag and drop interface helps non technical users.
Pre built templates reduce setup time.
Still requires practice when dealing with backend logic or integrating third party services.
If you’re comparing Bubble vs Flutterflow, remember: Bubble feels heavier for beginners, while Flutterflow feels smoother for mobile applications.
The biggest difference between the two platforms lies in the types of apps they excel at building.
Bubble Apps
Built for web applications and web app development.
Great for SaaS platforms, marketplaces, and fully functional web applications.
Works well for internal tools that require backend logic.
Bubble apps can include user authentication and workflows with ease.
Flutterflow Apps
Built for mobile applications and building native mobile apps.
Creates Android apps and iOS apps in one workflow.
Best for visually appealing mobile apps for mobile devices.
Flutterflow apps are ready for app store publishing without workarounds.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | Bubble Apps | Flutterflow Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Web apps | Strong for complex web apps | Limited |
| Mobile apps | Limited, not truly native | Strong, supports building native mobile apps |
| Code export | Not supported | Full code export available |
| App store publishing | Requires extra steps | Direct publishing supported |
| Internal tools | Excellent | Moderate |
| Database management | Very strong | Less advanced |
Design plays a huge role in how users perceive your product. Both platforms offer visual interfaces, but their approach differs.
Bubble
Offers a wide range of visual elements.
Responsive design tools are harder to use and feel outdated.
Best for web-first designs and workflows.
Requires more effort to create polished, mobile-friendly layouts.
Flutterflow
Drag and drop interface feels modern and fluid.
Pre built templates make creating apps faster.
UI components look natural on mobile devices.
Better suited for visually appealing mobile apps.
A platform’s power comes from how it handles workflows, app logic, and scalability.
Bubble
Strong backend logic with detailed custom workflows.
Handles complex user authentication.
Works well for apps with heavy backend workflows.
Bubble apps can scale, but database management must be carefully designed.
Flutterflow
Stronger on front-end and design logic.
Allows integrating custom code for advanced features.
Third party services are easy to connect.
Scales well for mobile applications using Google’s Flutter framework.
Internal tools are a major reason companies use no-code platforms. Both Bubble and Flutterflow can handle these, but with different strengths.
Bubble for Internal Tools
CRMs and customer dashboards.
Reporting and analytics platforms.
Data-heavy systems that need strong backend logic.
Excellent for internal workflows.
Flutterflow for Internal Tools
Mobile apps for employees.
Inventory tracking apps using native device features like camera.
Lightweight apps for mobile-first businesses.
More suitable when employees need mobile devices to interact with the app.
Sometimes businesses use FlutterFlow and Bubble together. Bubble handles the web applications and backend, while Flutterflow builds the mobile app version.
How much flexibility you have after building depends on whether you can export and modify your app’s code.
Bubble
No code export available.
Functionality is extended through plugins and APIs.
Reliant on Bubble’s ecosystem.
Flutterflow
Full code export supported.
Developers can directly edit the app’s code.
Supports integrating custom code for advanced features.
Better for teams that want flexibility and ownership of the app’s code.
Why get stuck with steep learning curves or platforms that don’t fit your vision?
Build any app with simple prompts; no code required.
With Rocket.new , you can bring your app ideas to life in minutes;no coding required. Simply enter a prompts, and Rocket will transform your concept into a fully functional app, making it easier than ever to turn your ideas into reality.
App scalability is critical when your user base grows. Bubble requires careful planning and database management to prevent performance bottlenecks. Flutterflow apps are naturally smoother on mobile devices because they rely on Google’s Flutter framework, which powers cross-platform mobile apps.
Both platforms integrate well with third-party services. Bubble excels in backend-heavy API integrations for web applications. Flutterflow makes it simple to add integrations like Stripe payments or Firebase push notifications into mobile applications.
This flow shows how your app idea branches depending on the platform. Bubble leads toward web applications and internal tools, while Flutterflow takes you into mobile app development and app store publishing.
Bubble vs FlutterFlow: A Comparative Analysis
A discussion on LinkedIn exploring the differences between Bubble and FlutterFlow, particularly in the context of React Native integration.
When comparing flutterflow vs bubble, the right choice depends on your project.
If you’re focused on web applications, SaaS tools, or internal tools with heavy backend logic, Bubble is the stronger platform.
If you’re building mobile applications , want visually appealing mobile apps, and plan to publish to the app store, Flutterflow is the better option.
Both platforms are excellent no code tools. Both cut down the development process compared to traditional app development. Your decision should follow your app idea and long-term goals.
