Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platformrocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Topics
Build 10x products in minutes by chatting with AI - beyond just a prototype.
Ship that idea single-handedly todayAI code assistants are rapidly changing how developers write software. From autocomplete to full-function generation, tools like Tabnine and GitHub Copilot have become integral to modern development workflows.
If you're a developer wondering which AI assistant to choose, this guide provides a head-to-head comparison of Tabnine vs GitHub Copilot—based on features, performance, pricing, and real-world use cases.
AI code assistants, such as GitHub Copilot and Tabnine, are revolutionizing the software development industry by providing intelligent code suggestions and completions. These tools utilize machine learning algorithms and natural language processing to understand the context of the code and generate relevant suggestions. With the ability to learn from user interactions and adapt to different programming languages and coding patterns, AI code assistants are becoming an essential part of the coding workflow. By automating repetitive tasks and providing real-time feedback, AI code assistants can significantly improve developer productivity and code quality. Whether you’re working in Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ IDEA, or any other development environment, these tools can seamlessly integrate into your setup, making your coding process more efficient and enjoyable.
Tabnine is an AI-powered code completion tool designed to enhance developer productivity through context-aware code suggestions. It uses machine learning models trained exclusively on permissive open-source licenses, ensuring a privacy-focused environment.
Tabnine takes a distinct approach to customization and data privacy by allowing users to fine-tune its pre-trained model to match their individual code practices and implementing a zero data retention policy.
Tabnine appeals to teams with a strong emphasis on data control and organizations that want to host models on-premises or in private clouds.
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding assistant developed by GitHub in collaboration with OpenAI, powered by the Codex model—a descendant of GPT-3.
GitHub Copilot's support for various programming languages and frameworks is extensive, particularly excelling with languages like Python, JavaScript, and C++.
Unlike Tabnine, Copilot focuses on generating larger code blocks and even entire functions, based on natural language prompts and context.
GitHub Copilot shines in projects that require creative and contextual code generation, especially when integrated with GitHub's DevOps environment.
| Feature | Tabnine | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| AI Engine | Proprietary ML models trained on permissive code | OpenAI Codex (GPT-based) |
| Output Focus | Syntax-based completion | Function and block generation |
| Language Support | 30+ languages | 20+ languages |
| IDE Support | VSCode, IntelliJ, Sublime, JetBrains, more | VSCode, JetHub Codespaces, JetBrains |
| Custom Training | Yes (for teams/enterprise) | No |
| Cloud/Offline Options | Cloud + Local | Cloud-only |
| Privacy Focus | High | Moderate |
| GitHub Integration | No | Deeply integrated |
| Natural Language Input | Limited | Strong (write comment, get code) |
| Pricing Tiers | Higher-priced plans provide more features such as code review and fine-tuned models | Higher-priced plans provide more features such as code review and fine-tuned models |
GitHub Copilot is known for its contextual and creative output—it can generate working functions from docstrings or natural language. However, its reliance on the internet and cloud also means more risk of “hallucinations”—generating inaccurate or insecure code. Additionally, there are potential IP issues arising from code suggestions made by AI tools like GitHub Copilot, as they use a vast array of publicly available data, which could inadvertently match proprietary code.
Tabnine focuses more on syntactic correctness, making it safer for enterprise environments but less innovative in terms of logic generation. Tabnine mitigates these IP concerns by training its models exclusively on permissively licensed code, thus providing a safer option for enterprises.
Data privacy and security are critical concerns for developers when using AI code assistants. GitHub Copilot, for instance, retains customer data for up to 28 days, which may raise concerns about intellectual property rights and data protection. On the other hand, Tabnine prioritizes data privacy and security by not storing any customer code and offering a local AI model for offline use. This approach ensures that sensitive codebases remain secure and protected from potential breaches. By choosing an AI code assistant that prioritizes data privacy and security, developers can ensure that their code remains protected and secure. This is particularly important for enterprise environments where data privacy is paramount, and any potential exposure of proprietary code could have significant repercussions.
| Plan | Tabnine | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Limited features | Limited functionality |
| Individual | $12/month | $10/month |
| Business/Teams | $25/user/month | $19/user/month |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Custom quote |
GitHub Copilot is slightly cheaper but lacks Tabnine’s enterprise-grade customization and local deployment. Enterprises might choose Tabnine over GitHub Copilot for its superior data security and customization options, making it ideal for environments requiring tight security measures.
Individual developers can benefit significantly from using AI code assistants like GitHub Copilot and Tabnine. These tools can help improve coding efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance overall code quality. With features like code completion, code suggestions, and model customization, AI code assistants can adapt to individual coding styles and preferences. Additionally, AI code assistants can assist with tasks such as testing and debugging, allowing developers to focus on more complex and creative aspects of software development. By leveraging the power of AI code assistants, individual developers can streamline their coding workflow, increase productivity, and deliver high-quality code faster. Whether you’re a solo developer working on a personal project or a freelancer juggling multiple clients, these tools can be invaluable in maintaining a high standard of code quality and efficiency.
AI code assistants raise important questions about code privacy and ownership. As these tools generate code based on user input and interactions, it is essential to consider who owns the generated code and how it can be used. GitHub Copilot’s terms of service, for instance, state that the user retains ownership of the code, but the company may use the code to improve its services. Tabnine, on the other hand, emphasizes its commitment to code privacy and security, ensuring that customer code is never stored or shared. By understanding the terms and conditions of AI code assistants and their approach to code privacy, developers can make informed decisions about which tools to use and how to protect their intellectual property. This understanding is crucial for developers working with sensitive or proprietary code, as it ensures that their intellectual property remains secure and under their control.
| Developer Type | Best Option |
|---|---|
| Solo developers & freelancers | GitHub Copilot |
| Enterprises with IP/privacy concerns | Tabnine |
| Teams wanting shared model training | Tabnine |
| Learners and code explorers | GitHub Copilot |
| Offline coding environments | Tabnine |
The choice between Tabnine and GitHub Copilot can also depend on the project type. For instance, GitHub Copilot might be more effective for open-source projects, while Tabnine is better suited for projects requiring stringent security measures for proprietary code.
Both Tabnine and GitHub Copilot are powerful AI coding assistants, but they serve different needs.
Ultimately, many developers find value in trying both tools to see which one aligns better with their workflow.
