Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platform 🚀rocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Topics
Implement Local AI solution in your app
Frameworks we support
Integrations we support
This comparison of PrivateGPT and LocalGPT guides your choice for a local AI. PrivateGPT offers a flexible framework for developers. LocalGPT provides a simple, ready-to-use application for individual users wanting to interact with their documents privately.
What if you could run a powerful AI on your computer, ensuring your data stays truly private?
This is now possible with open-source tools that let you analyze sensitive documents locally. Two leading solutions, PrivateGPT and LocalGPT, offer this capability, but which one should you choose? This detailed private GPT vs. local GPT comparison will break down their features and ideal use cases to help you make an informed decision.
Before diving into the specifics of each project, it's helpful to understand the core concept. A "private GPT" or local LLM refers to a setup where a large language model runs entirely on your hardware. This means from the moment you input a query to when the model generates a response, all processing happens on your computer.
Your data remains completely under your control, and no information ever leaves your local device. This approach directly addresses the privacy concerns associated with cloud-based AI services, making it ideal for handling confidential or sensitive information.
The primary motivation for running language models locally is privacy. When you use a commercial AI chatbot, your queries, the documents you upload, and the responses you receive are sent to and processed on company servers. With a local setup, this risk is eliminated. You can interact with your personal documents and proprietary data with the assurance that nothing is being monitored or stored by a third party. This process provides complete data sovereignty.
PrivateGPT is a production-ready AI project designed to provide a comprehensive and extensible framework for building private, context-aware AI applications. It's more than just a simple script; it's an API-centric system that enables developers to seamlessly integrate local AI capabilities into their software. This makes it an excellent choice for creating a production-ready AI project.
API-First Design: PrivateGPT is built around a FastAPI-based API that mimics the OpenAI API standard. This makes it easy for developers to switch between local and cloud-based GPT models.
Extensible Architecture: The project is highly modular , built on LlamaIndex and Pydantic, allowing for easy customization of various components, including the LLM, embedding model, and vector store.
Versatile Model Support: It offers support for a wider range of large language models and embedding backends, including Hugging Face , LlamaCPP, OpenAI, and Ollama.
Focus on RAG Applications: It provides all the necessary tools for building RAG applications (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), abstracting the complexities of document ingestion, embedding, and retrieval.
The process within PrivateGPT is sophisticated. When you provide documents, it uses components to parse various file formats, splits them into manageable chunks, and then uses an embedding model to create embeddings locally. These embeddings are stored in a vector database, such as Qdrant. When a user asks a question, the system retrieves relevant chunks from the database and feeds them to the large language model, which generates contextually aware and accurate responses.
LocalGPT is a popular open-source initiative that provides a straightforward way for users to chat with their documents locally. It was designed to be an accessible tool for individuals, researchers, and developers who need a simple yet powerful way to perform local document interactions without an internet connection.
Simplicity and Accessibility: LocalGPT's primary strength lies in its ease of use. The setup process is relatively straightforward, making it ideal for users who are not developers.
Hardware Acceleration: It has strong support for hardware acceleration, including NVIDIA GPUs (via CUDA) and Apple Metal (via MPS support), by leveraging llama-cpp-python. This allows for reasonable performance on consumer-grade hardware.
Multiple User Interfaces: The project supports two GUIs, providing users with a choice for their interaction method—a standard command line interface and a more intuitive graphical user interface.
Focused Functionality: It is specifically tailored for chatting with your documents, making it a highly optimized tool for this purpose.
The workflow in LocalGPT is direct and efficient. A user places their documents into a specific folder. Running an ingestion script processes these files, supporting various file formats. It uses open-source embeddings (like Instructor-XL) to generate vectors, which are then stored in a local vector database (ChromaDB). When a query is made, the system finds relevant text from the documents and uses a local LLM to formulate an answer, ensuring that the data leaves no trace outside the local machine.
While both tools enable private AI interactions, they differ significantly in their philosophy, architecture, and intended audience.
PrivateGPT is a comprehensive framework. Think of it as a backend engine designed for developers to build on top of. Its API-first approach means it's intended to be a component in a larger system, making it a robust choice for a production-ready AI project. It runs the entire RAG pipeline through a series of modular, replaceable components.
LocalGPT is a self-contained application. It's designed for end-users who want a ready-to-use tool for local document interactions. Its architecture is simpler and more monolithic , focusing on efficiently executing the core task of document-based Q&A.
Both projects offer versatile model support, but their approach differs.
PrivateGPT offers a pluggable architecture, allowing users to easily switch between different models and backends (e.g., Ollama, LlamaCPP, HuggingFace) through configuration files. This provides immense flexibility for developers experimenting with various LLM models and diverse embeddings.
LocalGPT has a strong focus on GGUF models, which are run via llama-cpp-python. While this provides excellent performance on a wide range of hardware, it is less flexible out of the box for those wanting to experiment with other LLM frameworks without code modification.
PrivateGPT offers a clean, functional graphical user interface built with Gradio, complemented by its powerful API. The primary focus, however, remains on the API for programmatic use.
LocalGPT offers a choice of two GUIs, giving users options for their user interface. This end-user focus makes it very approachable for non-developers. The availability of a dedicated graphical interface lowers the barrier to entry.
The performance of both tools is heavily dependent on the chosen model and the underlying hardware (CPU and GPU).
Both can achieve reasonable performance on modern computers. For optimal performance, a dedicated GPU with sufficient VRAM is recommended.
LocalGPT's tight integration with llama-cpp-python gives it an edge in raw inference speed on supported hardware, especially for users with Apple Silicon Macs (MPS support) or NVIDIA GPUs.
PrivateGPT, being a more complex application, may have slightly more overhead; however, its flexibility allows for fine-tuning the execution environment to achieve optimal performance in a production setting. The power of your computer directly impacts the speed of both applications.
Ready to select the right local AI for your privacy needs? Continue reading the detailed comparison to make an informed choice.
Getting started with either project involves a similar initial process. The exact commands may vary slightly due to updates.
For both, it is highly recommended to create a Python virtual environment to manage dependencies.
1python -m venv my-ai-env 2source my-ai-env/bin/activate # On Windows, use `my-ai-env\Scripts\activate`
This creates an isolated space for the installation process.
Next, you'll clone the repository from GitHub and install the required packages.
For PrivateGPT (Example):
1git clone https://github.com/zylon-ai/private-gpt.git 2cd private-gpt 3pip install -r requirements.txt
For LocalGPT (Example):
1git clone https://github.com/PromtEngineer/localGPT.git 2cd localGPT 3pip install -r requirements.txt
Note: Installing llama-cpp-python might require specific compilation flags depending on your hardware (e.g., for CUDA or Metal support) to get the best performance out of your system. This is a critical step to install correctly.
Both tools require you to download a large language model. This is typically a one-time download that requires an internet connection. Popular choices are available on platforms like Hugging Face. Once downloaded, you place the model file in a designated folder. Caching the model avoids repeated downloads.
The final step is to ingest your documents and start the application.
Ingestion: You'll run a Python script to process your source documents. This step populates the local vector database.
Running: You'll execute another command to start the chat interface. For example, the following command can be used to run LocalGPT:
python run\_localgpt.py
. For PrivateGPT, you would typically run the server and then access the user interface in a browser.
Both PrivateGPT and LocalGPT are excellent examples of running an entire RAG pipeline locally. This artificial intelligence technique enables them to answer questions based on your specific data.
The process begins by building a knowledge base from your documents.
Load: The system loads your files, supporting multiple file formats like PDF, TXT, and DOCX.
Split: It breaks down large documents into smaller, more manageable chunks.
Embed: It uses open-source embeddings to convert these text chunks into numerical vectors. This step captures the semantic meaning of your data.
Store: These vectors are saved in a local vector database.
When you ask a question, the system converts your query into a vector and searches the database for the most similar document chunks. In this context, along with your question, it is then sent to the local LLM, which generates a relevant answer. This ensures you get accurate responses grounded in your data.
For those seeking to leverage the power of large language models (LLMs) while ensuring the utmost privacy of their data, two open-source solutions—PrivateGPT and LocalGPT—have emerged as leading contenders.
Both allow users to run powerful AI on their machines, keeping sensitive documents and queries entirely offline. However, they cater to different user needs and varying levels of technical expertise. Here's a quick comparison to help you decide which is the right fit for you.
| Feature | PrivateGPT | LocalGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | A production-ready, API-centric framework for developers to build private, context-aware AI applications. | A user-friendly, self-contained application for individuals to securely chat with their documents. |
| Target Audience | Developers and organizations building custom AI solutions. | End-users, researchers, and individuals seeking a simple, out-of-the-box private chat solution. |
| Architecture | Modular and extensible, built on FastAPI and LlamaIndex, allowing for easy swapping of components like LLMs, embedding models, and vector stores. | More monolithic and focused on providing a straightforward document chat experience. |
| Ease of Use | Requires more technical expertise to set up and customize, aimed at a developer workflow. | Designed for simplicity and accessibility with a relatively straightforward setup process. |
| User Interface | Provides a functional web UI but is primarily API-driven for programmatic integration. | Offers multiple graphical user interface (GUI) options, making it more approachable for non-developers. |
| Model Support | Highly flexible, supporting a wide range of models through backends like Hugging Face, LlamaCPP, and Ollama. | Strong focus on GGUF models via llama-cpp-python, optimized for performance on consumer hardware. |
| Hardware Acceleration | Supports hardware acceleration, but configuration might be more involved depending on the chosen components. | Excellent out-of-the-box support for hardware acceleration, including NVIDIA GPUs (CUDA) and Apple Metal (MPS). |
| Customization | Highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the entire Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline to their specific needs. | Less flexible for deep customization without code modification, as it's designed as a complete application. |
| Ideal Use Case | Building scalable, enterprise-grade private AI applications and services. | Personal document analysis, secure research, and private Q&A with sensitive files. |
You are a developer building RAG applications.
You need an API to integrate AI into a larger project.
You require the flexibility to easily swap out different models, embeddings, and vector stores.
You are creating a solution for various industries that requires a customizable and extensible artificial intelligence backend.
You are an individual user, researcher, or student.
Your primary goal is to chat with your documents securely.
You want the simplest setup process for a fully functional local chat application.
You need strong out-of-the-box hardware acceleration and a responsive graphical user interface.
The decision in the private GPT vs. local GPT debate ultimately comes down to your specific objective. If you're a developer embarking on building RAG applications and need a flexible, API-driven foundation, PrivateGPT is the superior choice.
Its architecture is built for extension and integration. Conversely, if you are an end-user seeking a direct and simple path to converse with your documents securely, LocalGPT provides a more accessible and streamlined experience.
Both projects are outstanding contributions to the open-source initiative in private artificial intelligence, empowering users to harness large language technology while ensuring privacy and complete control over their data.
