Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platform 🚀rocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Topics
Generate your app fast, let AI automate complex logic
Frameworks we support
Integrations we support
What makes some AI responses almost instant? Prompt caching accelerates LLM workflows and reduces costs by reusing previously computed results. This guide walks you through how it works and where it delivers the biggest impact.
Why do some AI responses appear instantly while others lag?
Speed matters when you're building with large language models. But so do cost and scale. As these models power more workflows—from chat interfaces to document search—developers face growing pressure to reduce delays and cut spending.
What if you could avoid repeating the same computations again and again?
Prompt caching makes that possible. It stores parts of previous prompts, allowing them to be reused and skipping redundant processing. This helps reduce latency and lower compute bills by a wide margin, especially in multi-turn or high-volume applications.
We’ll now examine how prompt caching works, its benefits, where to apply it, and key considerations during implementation.
Let’s get into it.
Prompt caching reduces cost and latency by reusing responses for repeated prompts
A cache hit retrieves data instantly, while a cache miss forces a full recomputation
It is ideal for static instructions, documents, and multi-turn conversations
Major providers like Anthropic and Amazon Bedrock support prompt caching
Proper implementation improves cache hit rates and model efficiency
Prompt caching is a technique that enhances LLM performance by storing and reusing the precomputed parts of prompts, especially system instructions, document contents, or repeated user messages. When a new prompt comes in, the model checks whether it shares a prompt prefix with previously processed prompts. If it does, and a cache hit occurs, the model retrieves the cached data, thereby reducing the need to recalculate input tokens and speeding up the generation of output tokens.
In essence, prompt caching works by skipping repetitive work, reducing cost, and boosting speed. It's especially useful when dealing with multiple requests that share the same prefix, such as in chatbots or document QA systems.
Here’s a breakdown of the core process:
Static components, such as system prompts, instructions, or documents, are flagged. These do not change across subsequent requests, making them suitable for caching.
The model precomputes attention over these elements. This cache creation includes tool definitions, the system message, and the beginning of the messages array.
When a new request comes in, the model performs a cache lookup. If the prompt's beginning matches the stored version, a cache hit occurs. Otherwise, it results in a cache miss.
Each cache hit returns precomputed tokens (called cached tokens), accelerating processing. Caches usually expire in 5 minutes unless refreshed, though a 1-hour option is available in some systems.
New or unmatched prompts result in a cache write, where fresh computation is stored for future reuse.
When a prompt arrives, a cache lookup checks for existing cached prefixes. If matched, the system uses the stored data (cache hit). If unmatched, it computes a new response (cache miss), stores it (cache write), and proceeds.
By reusing cached tokens, prompt caching can lower the cost by up to 90%. For instance, pricing prompt caching in Anthropic shows cache hits occurring at just 10% of the base input token price.
Avoiding repeated processing reduces latency by up to 85%. Cached prompts enable faster api responses, especially in chat interfaces or document analysis.
Prompt caching enhances cache performance, leading to smoother system processes and real-time feedback in applications.
"Prompt caching only triggers a cache hit when the prompt prefix and generation parameters are identical. This ensures that the retrieved response is both accurate and efficient."
| Feature | Prompt Caching | Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Avoid reprocessing same prompt | Fetch relevant info before generating |
| Caching Used | Yes – stores cached prompts | No – fetches from external sources |
| Best For | Repetitive or static prompt structures | Dynamic queries with external data needs |
| Performance Gains | Reduces token usage and latency | Improves relevance but may increase latency |
| Dependency | On cache storage and TTL | On search and retrieval mechanisms |
In short, prompt caching works on reuse, while RAG enhances with retrieval. They can complement each other.
In customer support, repeated questions and system instructions benefit from caching. Cache checkpoint placement helps reuse conversation setups.
Tools that summarize or query long documents save time by caching the entire prompt or static content, such as PDFs.
Frequent suggestions rely on similar user messages or tool definitions, allowing cached responses and faster outputs.
For apps making api requests repeatedly, cached results improve performance across subsequent requests.
Despite its power, prompt caching introduces certain challenges:
Exact Matching Required: A cache hit needs an exact match in the prompt prefix, limiting flexibility.
Minimum Token Thresholds: Some systems require 1,024 to 2,048 input tokens for a valid cache creation.
Short Cache Lifetime: TTL is usually 5 minutes, although you can opt for 1-hour caches.
Debug Complexity: Managing cache writes, manual cache clearing, and breakpoints requires careful handling.
Not All Models Supported: Some LLMs or regions may not enable prompt caching yet.
Place Static Content First: Position system instructions early in the prompt for more cache hits.
Use Checkpoints Strategically: Insert cache breakpoints after reusable blocks, like in Anthropic or Amazon Bedrock.
Monitor Cache Hit Rates: Evaluate cache performance by reviewing cache hit vs. miss ratios.
Avoid Dynamic Content Early: Keep variable content out of the prefix to avoid invalidating the cache.
Track Token Usage: Utilize APIs with detailed parameters to monitor the generation of input and output tokens.
Look out for these api response fields for insights:
cache_creation_input_tokens: Tokens used when writing to the cache
cache_read_input_tokens: Tokens fetched from cache
cache_hit: Boolean flag indicating cache match
cache_checkpoint: Which checkpoint was reused
This helps fine-tune your caching strategy.
Systems like Anthropic allow:
Manual cache clearing: Clear caches during development or troubleshooting
Tool definitions: Place in prefix for repeated use
Cache invalidation: Triggered when the prompt structure changes
Disable prompt caching: Useful for debugging or testing changes
Prompt caching directly tackles the biggest hurdles in AI development — high costs, slow response times, and inefficient handling of repetitive tasks. By storing and reusing cached prompts, developers can significantly reduce latency, improve scalability, and drive down token-related expenses. For teams managing high-frequency api requests or building systems that rely on recurring system messages or static instructions, this optimization is not just helpful — it's critical.
As usage scales and expectations rise, relying on raw compute alone is no longer sustainable. Prompt caching is enabled across major platforms for a reason: it delivers measurable performance gains without compromising on quality.
Start implementing prompt caching today to unlock faster, leaner, and more reliable AI interactions. Build smarter, not harder—and let your cache work for you.
