Experience our new AI powered Web and Mobile app building platformrocket.new. Build any app with simple prompts- no code required.
Sign in
Sign in
Convert designs into modular code with built-in flexibility for modern frameworks.
Frameworks we support
Integrations we support
This article clearly compares Burp Suite and OWASP ZAP for web application security testing. It highlights their key features, strengths, and ideal use cases—from manual testing to CI/CD integration. You’ll learn how each tool fits different security needs to help you make the right choice.
Which tool gives you better protection—Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP?
Web applications face daily threats like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and broken access control. Choosing the right security testing tool matters more than ever as attacks grow. Burp Suite and OWASP ZAP are two widely used options in this space. Each offers useful features for tasks like penetration testing, API checks, and CI/CD pipelines. Their differences, though, can affect your workflow and results.
This blog compares Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP to help you pick the one that fits your goals best.
Ready to weigh your options and move forward with clarity?
The answer depends on your security testing goals, budget, and technical expertise.
Here's a breakdown:
Burp Suite, developed by PortSwigger, is widely recognized among penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security teams for its comprehensive capabilities. It has multiple versions, including the free Community Edition and the feature-rich Burp Suite Pro (Professional Edition).
Key Features:
Intercepting proxy for capturing and manipulating traffic
Intruder for automated fuzzing
Repeater and manual request editor for manual testing
Decoder, Comparer, and scanner for deep vulnerability analysis
Advanced API security testing support
High accuracy in vulnerability scanning, with fewer false positives
BApp Store for add-ons that extend functionality
Burp Suite’s ease of use, powerful automation, and depth of analysis make it the go-to choice for testing web applications professionally.
OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) is an open-source tool the OWASP Foundation manages. It is ideal for users looking for a free tool to perform web application security testing with strong automation capabilities.
Key Features:
AJAX spider for mapping single-page applications
Scripting support with JavaScript for UI and scan customization
YAML-based automation framework for CI/CD pipelines
Active and passive vulnerability scanning
Easily installable add-ons via the marketplace
OWASP ZAP excels in CI/CD environments and is well-suited for API security testing, particularly when integrated into development workflows.
| Criteria | Burp Suite | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Paid (with free version limits) | Fully free and open source |
| Ease of Use | High | Moderate |
| Automation | Moderate | Strong (YAML-based) |
| Pentesting Features | Strong (e.g., malformed requests) | Limited |
| API Security Testing | Advanced capabilities | Automation-friendly |
| SPAs Support | Improved recently | Historically better (AJAX spider) |
| Community Support | Extensive | Growing |
| Scripting | Java-based, requires setup | JavaScript, built-in |
| CI/CD Integration | Possible via extensions | Native support |
| Add-ons | BApps, Java-based | Scripts, easily installed |
Despite being a powerful tool and a great free tool, OWASP ZAP does come with limitations:
ZAP cannot send malformed HTTP requests, a critical feature for advanced penetration testing. This restricts the ability to explore edge-case vulnerabilities essential for deep application security testing.
Due to the UI's less polished design, fuzzing and manual exploration require more effort. For example, fuzzer results appear in a single window, making analysis harder than Burp Suite’s tab-based view.
ZAP does not allow changing HTTP headers directly during fuzzing—this can hinder identifying vulnerabilities related to session management or header-based controls.
Compared to PortSwigger Burp Suite, ZAP’s documentation can feel fragmented, especially for users new to security testing or scripting.
Its vulnerability scanning can produce more false positives than Burp Suite Pro, requiring testers to verify many results manually.
Choose: OWASP ZAP
Budget constraints make the free version attractive.
YAML automation helps integrate into CI/CD.
Strong for initial security testing phases.
Choose: Burp Suite Pro
Needs to send malformed HTTP requests.
Requires precise detection of common vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Benefit from the manual request editor, Intruder, and Comparer features.
Choose: Burp Suite Pro or ZAP
Burp Suite offers better API security accuracy.
ZAP offers easier automation and scripting flexibility.
Burp Suite:
◦ Strong presence in forums, Reddit, and bug bounty platforms.
◦ Rich ecosystem of add-ons and BApps.
◦ Preferred by professional penetration testers and pen testers.
OWASP ZAP:
◦ Flagship open-source project by OWASP.
◦ Active community, but fewer professional-grade extensions.
◦ Ideal for teams that value community support over commercial solutions.
Choosing between Burp Suite and OWASP ZAP involves aligning the tool with your security testing goals, technical needs, and budget.
The right choice hinges on your team’s needs:
If you need advanced penetration testing, reliable vulnerability scanning, and efficient manual testing capabilities, opt for Burp Suite Pro.
Choose OWASP ZAP if you prioritize automation, need a free tool, and want easy scripting for CI/CD pipelines.
In a world where web application vulnerabilities can cost more than downtime, having the right tool isn't optional—it's essential.
Start testing smarter—choose the tool that empowers your team to stay secure, proactive, and ahead of threats.
