Budibase vs Appsmith: A Real Talk About Building Internal Tools

Budibase and Appsmith are open-source platforms for building internal tools. Budibase offers a visual, low-code experience for IT professionals, while Appsmith provides a code-centric environment for developers. This comparison examines their features to help you choose.

So, you're looking to build internal tools without writing code from scratch? I get it. Your team needed admin panels, dashboards, and business apps yesterday, but your developers are swamped with other projects. That's where low-code platforms come in; today, we're comparing two popular options: Budibase vs. Appsmith.

I've spent time with both platforms, building everything from simple data entry forms to complex applications with multiple data sources. Let me share what I've learned about these low-code tools and help you determine which one best fits your needs.

Understanding the Low-Code Space

Both Budibase and Appsmith are open-source, low-code platforms designed to help teams quickly build internal tools. They promise rapid development without extensive coding knowledge, but they approach this goal in a different way.

Budibase positions itself as the choice for IT professionals who need to ship internal applications fast. Think of solutions architects, data professionals, and systems engineers who understand technical concepts but don't necessarily want to write custom code for every single feature. The platform emphasizes its drag-and-drop interface and pre-built components.

Appsmith, on the other hand, targets developers who want to build internal apps without having to deal with design work. It's for engineers who are comfortable with database queries and JavaScript and need more control over their applications. While it offers visual development, you'll often need custom development for anything beyond basic functionality.

The User Interface Battle

Let's talk about how you build apps with these platforms. The visual interface matters because it determines how quickly your team can create functional internal tools.

Budibase's Approach

Budibase provides a true drag-and-drop experience through its intuitive visual interface. The platform includes:

• Pre-built UI components that work out of the box

• Built-in components for common patterns like forms and tables

• Customizable themes without writing CSS

• Mobile responsive designs are, by default

• Auto-generation of CRUD interfaces from your database schema

What I appreciate about Budibase is how it handles the basics. Do you need a form connected to your SQL databases? The platform can generate one automatically. Want to display data in a table? Just drag and drop components onto your canvas.

Appsmith's Interface

Appsmith also offers a drag-and-drop interface, but with a different philosophy. Here's what you get:

• Over 45 UI components, including charts, forms, and tables

• More granular control through JavaScript

• Custom widgets that you can build with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript

• A canvas-based approach to positioning elements

The key difference? Appsmith expects you to write more code. While non-technical users can build simple interfaces, you'll hit limits quickly without JavaScript knowledge. The learning curve is steeper, particularly for teams without a strong development background.

Copy
1// Example of custom logic in Appsmith
2export default {
3  validateForm: () => {
4    const email = Input1.text;
5    const phone = Input2.text;
6
7    if (!email.includes('@')) {
8      return showAlert('Invalid email', 'error');
9    }
10
11    if (phone.length < 10) {
12      return showAlert('Phone number too short', 'error');
13    }
14
15    return storeValue('formValid', true);
16  }
17}

This code shows how Appsmith handles form validation. You need to write custom JavaScript functions for business logic that Budibase might handle through its built-in features.

Data Connectivity and Integration

Modern internal tools need to connect to multiple data sources. Both platforms understand this, but they handle data integration differently.

Budibase Data Sources

Budibase supports extensive data connectivity:

• SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MSSQL)

• NoSQL options (MongoDB, CouchDB, DynamoDB)

• REST APIs and GraphQL

• Google Sheets and Airtable

• Built-in database (BudibaseDB) with CSV import

The platform's strength lies in its ability to auto-generate interfaces from your data. Connect a PostgreSQL database, and Budibase can automatically create forms and tables. This rapid application development approach saves hours of setup time.

Appsmith Data Integration

Appsmith offers similar data connectivity but with a developer-first approach:

• Database support for major SQL and NoSQL systems

• REST and GraphQL API integration

• Third-party services through custom connectors

• Real-time data synchronization capabilities

The difference shows in implementation. Appsmith gives you fine-grained control over queries and data transformations, but you'll write more code to achieve it.

Workflow Automation Capabilities

Building internal tools isn't just about user interfaces; it's also about creating a seamless experience. You need workflow automation to handle business processes effectively.

Budibase Workflows

Budibase includes a visual automation builder that lets you create automated workflows without code:

• Trigger-based automation (webhooks, schedules, row changes)

• Pre-built action blocks for common tasks

• Email notifications and alerts

• File handling and document generation

• Integration with Zapier for external automation

The automation editor uses a flowchart approach. You can see your entire workflow at a glance and test each step individually. For teams seeking to automate business processes efficiently, this visual approach simplifies complexity.

This diagram shows a typical order approval workflow you might build in Budibase. The visual nature makes it easy to understand and modify complex workflows.

Appsmith Automation

Appsmith's automation features are more code-centric:

• JavaScript-based automation logic

• API-triggered workflows

• Custom event handlers

• Integration through webhooks

While powerful, Appsmith requires you to write JavaScript for most automation tasks. This provides flexibility but requires technical expertise. Teams without developers might struggle to implement complex workflows.

Custom Components and Extensibility

Sometimes, pre-built components aren't enough. You require custom functionality tailored to your specific business needs.

Budibase Custom Development

Budibase offers a plugin system for deeper customization:

• CLI tools for creating custom components

• Custom data sources for proprietary systems

• JavaScript for business logic when needed

• Plugin marketplace for community contributions

The key advantage? You can extend Budibase without modifying core functionality. Build a custom component once and reuse it across all your apps.

Appsmith Custom Code

Appsmith takes a different approach with custom widgets:

• Write HTML, CSS, and JavaScript directly

• Create interactive elements from scratch

• More control, but requires coding skills

• No plugin system like Budibase

This approach works well for developers but creates barriers for other team members. You're writing mini web apps within Appsmith.

Version Control and Collaboration

Modern development needs version control. Both platforms support Git, but their implementations differ significantly.

Appsmith's Git Integration

Appsmith offers comprehensive Git-based version control:

• Connect to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and others

• Branch protection for production environments

• Pull request workflows

• CI/CD integration for continuous deployment

• Commit history and rollback capabilities

This git integration makes Appsmith attractive for development teams already using these workflows. You can treat your low-code apps like any other software project.

Budibase's Approach

Budibase currently lacks built-in Git integration. While you can export and import apps, there's no native version control system. For teams that require Git-based version control, this limitation may be significant.

However, Budibase focuses on other collaboration features:

• Role-based access control for team management

• User permissions at the app and data level

• Audit logging for compliance

• Environment management without Git

Pricing and Deployment Considerations

Cost matters, especially when you're scaling internal tools across your organization. Let's break down the pricing models.

Budibase Pricing

Budibase uses a traditional per-user pricing model:

• Free tier: 5 users (cloud) or 25 users (self-hosted)

• Unlimited applications on all tiers

• Paid plans include more users and enterprise features

• Self-hosting is available on all plans

The predictable pricing makes budgeting straightforward. You know exactly what you'll pay based on user count.

Appsmith Pricing

Appsmith's pricing is more complex:

• A free tier with unlimited users and apps

• Paid plans based on usage hours ($40/month for 100 hours)

• Costs capped at 50 hours per user

• Limited features on the free tier (only 3 RBAC roles)

While the free tier may seem generous, feature restrictions might prompt you to upgrade to a paid plan quickly. The hourly pricing can also make costs unpredictable.

Making the Right Choice

So, which platform should you choose? It depends on your team and requirements.

Choose Budibase When:

You have IT professionals who need to quickly build internal tools. The visual development approach and pre-built ui components let you ship apps fast. Your team includes non-technical users who need to create simple applications. The drag-and-drop components and embedded database make it easy to use.

You need predictable pricing and self-hosting options. Budibase's per-user model and own infrastructure deployment give you control. Workflow automation is important. The visual automation builder handles complex business logic without code.

Choose Appsmith When:

Your team consists primarily of developers. The platform assumes knowledge of JavaScript and rewards it with flexibility. Git integration is non-negotiable. Appsmith's version control features match modern development workflows.

You need maximum customization. Custom widgets and extensive JavaScript support enable deeper customization. You're building for occasional use. The hourly pricing model might save money for infrequently used apps.

Common Limitations

Both platforms have constraints. Neither excels at building customer-facing web applications or mobile applications (despite offering mobile-responsive designs). They're designed for internal applications, not public websites.

The steep learning curve for Appsmith might frustrate teams expecting true no-code development. Meanwhile, Budibase's lack of Git integration could be a dealbreaker for some development teams.

Consider vendor lock-in carefully. While both are open source, migrating between platforms requires significant effort. Choose based on long-term needs, not just immediate requirements.

Build Apps 10x Faster with Rocket

Just type your idea, and within minutes, you will ship the first version of your website for your business.

Built a real app in just 20 minutes - no code, just one prompt.

Sounds unbelievable? That’s exactly what I did using Rocket (by DhiWise), the world’s most advanced vibe coding tool. — Check out entire LinkedIn post here

Supports:

• Figma to code

• Flutter (with state management)

• React, Next.js, HTML (with TailwindCSS/HTML), and reusable components

• Third-party integrations like GitHub, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Google Analytics, Google AdSense, Perplexity

• Email provider via Resend

• Payment integration via Stripe

• Database support with Supabase integration

• Ship your app via Netlify for free

• Visual element editing

• Upload custom logos, screenshots, and mockups as design references — or swap images instantly.

• Publish your mobile and web app and share a fully interactive link

While Budibase and Appsmith excel at internal tools, Rocket.new takes a different approach. It helps you build complete web applications with AI assistance, perfect for when you need more than just internal dashboards.

Check it out here →

The Bottom Line

Both Budibase and Appsmith are solid choices for building internal tools. Budibase excels in accessibility and rapid development, making it an ideal choice for IT teams that require fast results. Appsmith offers more control and better integration with developer workflows, making it perfect for engineering teams that are comfortable with code.

The low-code platform you choose should match your team's skills and project requirements. Don't pick based on features alone. Consider who will build and maintain these tools, what data sources you need to connect, and how complex your workflows will become.

Remember, the goal isn't to eliminate all coding. It's to build internal tools efficiently while maintaining flexibility for custom development when needed. Both platforms achieve this goal, just through different paths.