Sign in
Topics
All you need is the vibe. The platform takes care of the product.
Turn your one-liners into a production-grade app in minutes with AI assistance - not just prototype, but a full-fledged product.
This blog compares Biome and ESLint for JavaScript linting and formatting. It covers setup, performance, configuration, and when to use each tool. Ideal for developers seeking speed, simplicity, or customization.
Tired of juggling ESLint, Prettier, and endless plugins just to keep your JavaScript code clean? Meet Biome—a faster, simpler all-in-one alternative. This guide breaks down how Biome stacks up against ESLint and helps you pick the right tool for your project.
This blog compares Biome and ESLint, helping JavaScript developers decide which tool best suits their needs. You'll learn how formatting and linting, configuration simplicity, performance, and project requirements shape this decision. Expect code examples, config comparisons, and clear guidance for choosing the right setup—whether you're building a small side project or managing a large-scale production app.
Modern JavaScript development demands high code quality, consistency, and fast feedback. Without proper formatting rules and static checks, teams risk running into error-prone code, unreadable files, and mismatched coding standards.
Historically, this has meant pairing tools like ESLint and Prettier. But now, many teams are asking: Can one tool handle everything?
Enter Biome, a blazing-fast alternative aiming to unify your JavaScript ecosystem under a single configuration file.
Biome is a command-line tool built to replace ESLint, Prettier, and more. Written in Rust, it emphasizes speed and simplicity while delivering high-performance formatting and linting.
Formatter and linter in one
Built-in code formatting support (similar to Prettier)
Fast static analysis for JavaScript, TypeScript, JSON, and other file types
Native support for pre-commit hook setups
Single binary with no external plugins required
Biome supports JSON-based configuration files, keeping everything simple and performant.
Here’s a direct comparison of Biome vs ESLint in the context of real-world usage:
Feature | Biome | ESLint |
---|---|---|
Formatting | Built-in Prettier-like | Requires Prettier integration |
Linting | Built-in | Powerful, via rules and plugins |
Configuration File | Single JSON file | Multiple: .eslintrc, .prettierrc |
Performance | Rust-based; very fast | Slower (Node.js-based) |
Extensibility | Limited (opinionated) | Highly extensible |
Plugins | Not required | Heavily plugin-driven |
Default Settings | Sensible defaults, less config | Requires more eslint configuration |
Here’s how you can get started by integrating Biome into your existing JavaScript project:
1npm install --save-dev biome
Biome uses a single configuration file called biome.json
.
1{ 2 "formatter": { 3 "enabled": true 4 }, 5 "linter": { 6 "enabled": true 7 } 8}
This file contains formatting rules, lint settings, and paths for the files to process.
1npx biome format .
1npx biome lint .
1npx biome check .
Biome uses fast static analysis to detect problematic patterns and applies fixes if needed.
If you’re sticking with ESLint and Prettier :
.eslintrc.json
:1{ 2 "extends": ["eslint:recommended", "plugin:prettier/recommended"] 3}
.prettierrc
for prettier configuration:1{ 2 "semi": false, 3 "singleQuote": true 4}
You now need multiple configuration files, syncing rules between them, and managing updates across both tools.
Biome focuses on performance. Since it’s written in Rust, running Biome is much faster than Node-based tools.
In contrast, ESLint remains more flexible, especially for large teams needing custom rules, third-party plugins, or deep framework integrations.
Let’s format some JavaScript using Biome.
1function hello( ) {console.log("hello")}
biome format
:1function hello() { 2 console.log("hello"); 3}
Biome applies opinionated formatting rules—much like Prettier—but directly inside the same tool.
For automated checks, add Biome to your continuous integration pipeline:
1# .github/workflows/biome.yml 2jobs: 3 lint: 4 runs-on: ubuntu-latest 5 steps: 6 - uses: actions/checkout@v3 7 - run: npm install 8 - run: npx biome check .
To use a pre-commit hook with Biome:
1npx husky add .husky/pre-commit "npx biome check ."
Now every commit enforces consistent code formatting and style.
Biome’s configuration file (biome.json
) supports several options:
1{ 2 "files": { 3 "ignore": ["dist/", "node_modules/"] 4 }, 5 "formatter": { 6 "enabled": true, 7 "indentStyle": "space", 8 "lineWidth": 80 9 }, 10 "linter": { 11 "enabled": true, 12 "rules": { 13 "recommended": true 14 } 15 } 16}
This single JSON file replaces multiple layers of ESLint configuration and Prettier configuration.
Biome even handles JSON files, TypeScript files, and react native codebases out of the box.
You want one tool to handle formatting + linting
Speed and simplicity matter more than customization
You prefer a single configuration file
You work in smaller teams, side projects, or greenfield apps
You need advanced ESLint rules
Your team relies on custom plugins
You already have a mature ESLint and Prettier setup
You maintain a legacy JavaScript ecosystem
If you value high-quality code and streamlined tooling, Biome deserves attention. It replaces the traditional ESLint + Prettier setup with one project, one tool, and one configuration file—offering clean, fast, and reliable results. While ESLint remains a powerhouse in the JavaScript ecosystem, Biome offers a simpler experience for developers focused on consistency and speed.
To get started, try the following command:
1npx biome init
Need a quick start? Head to https://biomejs.dev for docs, examples, and config guides. Whether you're working with react native, JSON, or plain JavaScript, Biome might just be your next favorite formatter.